Effects of Reinforcing Attention and Response Confirmation on Preschool Children Observational Learning

Main Article Content

Agustín Zárate Loyola
Jesús Ma. de Luna Ortiz

Abstract

Observational learning was studied in preschool children, comparing their performance under two reinforcement conditions: a) by attending other children' s responses, and b) by confirming other children' s answers. Four third grade preschool children, were trained to discriminate a series of drawings designed as a combination of ideograms of the Japanese Kanji and some international symbols of Agriculture. The subjects were divided in pairs and undergone both conditions in an individual design of pretest-postest in arder to evaluate their discrimination level. During the training, two types of stimuli were introduced: the trained stimulus in a direct form; and the reinforced stimulus by being observed or confirmed by other trained children. A third stimulus was included as a control in pretest and postest. In the results a difference was observed on the levels of discrimination between the phases of pretest and postest: 1) in the stimuli that was trained directly, an increase of 17.5% to 97.5% of correct answers was observed; 2) in the stimuli reinforced by attention, the increase was slightly minor, its level increased from 30% to 62%, while in the stimuli reinforced by confirmation, the increase observed was from 20% to 95 %; 3) on the stimuli used as control, the noted change was only from 10% to 12.5%.,This study replicated the findings obtained previously by Zarate and Le Blanc (1983) and confirmed that although observation facilitates the learning of certain task~, observational learning is better when the response is confirmed because in addition, information on the quality of the response is also provided.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zárate Loyola, A., & de Luna Ortiz, J. M. (2011). Effects of Reinforcing Attention and Response Confirmation on Preschool Children Observational Learning. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 22(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v22.i2.25431