Companion Dogs as Surrogate Family Members and the Compensation Hypothesis
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
The belief that bonding with companion animals seeks to substitute for human relationships has been widely held as common knowledge, receiving partial support even by scientific literature. This study aimed to assess the effect of compensation of lacking human bonds (i.e., partner and children) through bonding with companion dogs. For this, 425 adults living in Buenos Aires, who own a companion dog, filled out a form about Perceived Emotional Closeness and another one about anthropomorphism towards dogs. The fact of having children, regardless of the cohabitation with them and the guardian’s marital status, was linked to lower scores of emotional closeness; however, there were no differences in terms of the levels of dog’s anthropomorphism between guardians who lived with a couple or not, between those who had children or not, neither between those who lived with their children or not. Furthermore, among parent guardians, there was no difference in the levels of Anthropomorphism and Perceived Emotional Closeness in relationship with their children’s age. We concluded that dogs seem to have their own particular role within their guardian’s close circle of relationships, instead of competing with human family roles. Guardians who consider their dog as a child would not imply the substitution for absent children. For these guardians, this consideration would be rather related to their affection towards the dog. The differences in the emotional closeness among guardians with or without children are discussed according to a possible attitudinal change, after parenthood, that would lead to a lower interspecies affective permeability. Considering the particular role of dogs in the guardian’s emotional circle can lead us to the appraisal of the differential aspects of this interspecies relationship with positive consequences for both, humans and dogs.
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Albert, A., & Bulcroft, K. (1988). Pets, Families, and the Life Course. Journal of Marriage & Family, 50(2), 543-552. https://www.jstor.org/stable/352019
Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6-47. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-45084-001
Archer, J. (1997). Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human behavior, 18(4), 237-259. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162309599800014
Archer, J. (2011). Pet keeping: A case study in maladaptive behavior. In C. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.). The oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 281-296). Oxford University Press.
Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121-145. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853096x00115
Bodsworth, W., & Coleman, G. J. (2001). Child–companion animal attachment bonds in single and two-parent families. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 216-223. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279301786999391
Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2016). Pet Face: Mechanisms Underlying Human-Animal Relationships. Frontiers in psychology, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298/full
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Boya, U. O., Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2012). Dimensions of the dog–human relationship: A segmentation approach. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(2), 133-143. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/jt.2012.8
Cohen, S. P. (2002). Can pets function as family members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 621-638. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019394502320555386
Díaz Videla, M. (2015). El miembro no humano de la familia: las mascotas a través del ciclo vital familiar. Revista Ciencia Animal, (9), 83-98. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44187531/REVISTA_CIENCIA_ANIMAL_-_El_miembro_no_humano_de_la_familia_-_Las_mascotas_a_traves_del_ciclo_vital_familiar.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1533153905&Signature=gWBwzYd94NmSnceRcAKIxiKljzg%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DEl_miembro_no_humano_de_la_familia_Las_m.pdf
Dwyer, F., Bennett, P. C., & Coleman, G. J. (2006). Development of the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale (MDORS). Anthrozoös, 19(3), 243-256. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279306785415592
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review, 114(4), 864. http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2007-13558-002.html
Fatjó, J., Darder, P., Calvo, P., Bowen, J., & Bulbena, A. (2013). Is dog ownership the same for men and women, parents and non-parents? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(8), 44. https://www.journalvetbehavior.com/article/S1558-7878(13)00093-2/abstract
George, D., & Mallery, P. (1994). SPSS/PC + step by step: A simple guide and reference. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Harker, R. M., Collis, G. M., & McNicholas, J. (2000). The influence of current relationships upon pet animal acquisition. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul & J. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp.189–208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, T. P., Garrity, T. F., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5(3), 160-175. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279392787011395
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Antebi, A., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2016). Basic psychological need fulfillment in human–pet relationships and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 69-73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915301070
Levinson, B. M. (1969). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Martens, P., Enders-Slegers, M. J., & Walker, J. K. (2016). The emotional lives of companion animals: Attachment and subjective claims by owners of cats and dogs. Anthrozoös, 29(1), 73-88. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927936.2015.1075299
McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(6), 1239. http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2011-13783-001.html
Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., ... & Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333-336. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6232/333.short
Nagasawa, M., Mogi, K., & Kikusui, T. (2009). Attachment between humans and dogs. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(3), 209-221. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00402.x
Paul, E. S. (2000). Love of pets and love of people. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul & J. A. Serpell (Eds), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 168-186). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Power, E. (2008). Furry families: making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535-555. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649360802217790
Sanders, C. R. (1993). Understanding dogs. Caretakers' attributions of mindedness in canine-human relationships. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 22(2), 205-226. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/089124193022002003
Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405-426. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405
Serpell, J. A. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge University Press.
Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection-Beyond the "cute response". Society and Animals, 11(1), 83-100. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853002320936926
Serpell, J. A., & Paul, E. (2011). Pets in the family: An evolutionary perspective. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (298-309). Oxford University Press.
Shir‐Vertesh, D. (2012). “Flexible personhood”: Loving animals as family members in Israel. American Anthropologist, 114(3), 420-432. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x
Turner, W. G. (2005). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal Of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11-21. doi: 10.1300/J039v09n04̱02 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J039v09n04_02
Walsh, F. (2009). Human-Animal Bonds II: The Role of Pets in Family Systems and Family Therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481-499. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x
Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345-357. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656611000584
Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Pets as safe havens and secure bases: The moderating role of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 571-580. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656612001079
Esta revista es de acceso libre inmediato a su contenido, bajo el principio de hacer disponible al público gratuitamente las investigaciones publicadas.
Los autores que publiquen en Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, en Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será transferido —de forma no exclusiva— a la revista para su difusión en acceso abierto.
- La revista Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) no realiza cargos a los autores por enviar y procesar artículos para su publicación.
- Todos los textos publicados por en Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI)
—sin excepción— se distribuyen amparados bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución- NoComercial 4.0 Internacional, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI), por ejemplo incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o darlo a conocer en otros medios en papel o electrónicos, siempre que indique clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en el Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI).
- Para todo lo anterior, los autores deben remitir el formato de carta de transmisión de derechos patrimoniales de la primera publicación debidamente requisitado y firmado, al momento de ser aceptado para su publicación el manuscrito en cuestión.
This is an open-access journal in terms of its content, under the premise of making published research available to the public for free.
The authors who publish on the Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) accept the following terms:
- In accordance to the copyright law, the Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) recognizes and respects the moral law of the authors, as well as the ownership right, which will be transferred –in a non-exclusive manner- to the journal for its open access diffusion.
- The Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) does not charge the authors for sending and processing the papers for their publication.
- Every text published by the Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI) –with no exception- is distributed under protection of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows third parties to utilize what was published as long as they mention the authorship of the paper and the first publication in this journal.
- The authors can hold other contractual agreements, independent and additional to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article in the Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI), such as including it in an institutional repository or promoting it through channels different from paper or electronic publications, as long as it indicates clearly and explicitly that the paper was first published in the Journal of Behavior, Health and Social Issues (JBHSI).
- For all the previous matters, the authors must refer the format of the letter of transference of patrimonial rights of the first publication, properly required and signed, at the moment of being approved for publication in the manuscript at issue.