THE MICRO-MACRO DIVIDE OF NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMICS VS. THE MACRO-MICROSCOPIC CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY APPROACH

Contenido principal del artículo

Lefteris Tsoulfidis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2691-0128
Nikolaos Chatzarakis
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-1428

Resumen

ABSTRACT


This paper analyzes the historical and theoretical origins of the micro-macro division in neoclassical economics, contrasting it with the integrated framework of Classical Political Economy (CPE). Neoclassical economics, emerging in the late 19th century, replaced the Labor Theory of Value (LTV) with a subjective framework based on individual preferences. This shift created the basis for the bifurcation of the discipline, which was solidified by the monopolistic competition and Keynesian revolutions of the 1930s. However, the stagflation of the 1970s exposed the limitations of neoclassical theory, and attempts to address them via microfoundations proved largely inadequate. In contrast, CPE views capitalism as an interconnected system defined by class relations and capital accumulation. By grounding aggregate variables in labor values, CPE provides a unified macro-microscopic perspective capable of coherently explaining effective demand, growth, and stagnation.


LA BRECHA MICRO-MACRO DE LA ECONOMÍA NEOCLÁSICA FRENTE AL ENFOQUE MACRO-MICROSCÓPICO DE LA ECONOMÍA POLÍTICA CLÁSICA


RESUMEN


Este trabajo analiza los orígenes históricos y teóricos de la división micro-macro en la economía neoclásica, en contraste con el marco integrado de la Economía Política Clásica (EPC). La economía neoclásica, surgida a finales del siglo XIX, sustituyó a la teoría del valor-trabajo (TVT) por un enfoque subjetivo basado en las preferencias individuales. Este giro sentó las bases de la bifurcación de la disciplina, que se consolidó con las revoluciones de la competencia monopolística y del keynesianismo en la década de 1930. Sin embargo, la estanflación de la década de 1970 puso en evidencia las limitaciones de la teoría neoclásica, y los intentos por superarlas mediante las microfundamentaciones resultaron en gran medida inadecuados. En contraste, la EPC concibe al capitalismo como un sistema interconectado definido por las relaciones de clase y la acumulación de capital. Al fundamentar las variables agregadas en los valores-trabajo, la EPC ofrece una perspectiva macro-micro unificada, capaz de explicar de manera coherente la demanda efectiva, el crecimiento y el estancamiento.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Tsoulfidis, L., & Chatzarakis, N. . (2026). THE MICRO-MACRO DIVIDE OF NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMICS VS. THE MACRO-MICROSCOPIC CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY APPROACH. Investigación Económica, 85(336), 158–182. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2026.336.92368

Citas en Dimensions Service

Citas

Bacon, R., and Eltis, W. (1976). Britain’s Economic Problem: Too Few Producers. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15661-4

Baumol, W. (1967). Macroeconomics Of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy Of Urban Crisis. The American Economic Review, 57(3), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1812111

Bronfenbrenner, M. (1969). Is the Business Cycle Obsolete? New York: John Willey.

Bukharin, N.I. (1972). The Economic Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: NYU Press.

Chatzarakis, N., Tsaliki, P., and Tsoulfidis, L. (2024). Economic Growth and Long Cycles: A Classical Political Economy Perspective. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432654

Clark, B.J. (1886). The Philosophy of Wealth: Economic Principles Newly Formulated. Boston: Ginn & Company.

Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xp3srw

Debreu, G. (1974). Excess Demand Functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(74)90032-9

Denis, A. (2016) Microfoundations. Review of Political Economy, 28(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1108132

de Wolff, P. (1941). Income Elasticity of Demand, a Micro-economic and a Macro-economic Interpretation. Economic Journal, 51(201), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2225656

Dobb, M. (1925). Capitalist Enterprise and Social Progress. London: George Routledge & Sons.

Dobb, M. (1937). Political Economy and Capitalism: Some Essays in Economic Tradition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822830

Eatwell, J. (1983). Theories of Value, Output and Employment. In: J. Eatwell and M. Milgate (eds.), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (pp. 85-105). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198286498.001.0001

Eatwell, J., and Milgate, M. (2011). The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199777283.001.0001

Felin, T., and Foss, N. (2005). Strategic Organization: A Field in Search of Micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 34, 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796

Frisch, R. (1933). Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics. In: Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel (pp. 171-205). London: Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170116.032

Fuchs, C. (2015). Reading Marx in the Information Age: A Media and Communication Studies Perspective on Capital Volume 1. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669564

Garegnani, P. (1970). Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 37(3), 407-436. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296729

Hahn, F. (2003). Macro Foundations of Micro-economics. Economic Theory, 2(12), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-002-0309-4

Heath, J. (2005). Methodological Individualism. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/methodological-individualism/

Hicks, J. (1939). Value and Capital. An Inquiry into some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory (Second Edition). Oxford University Press.

Hilferding, R. (1920). Böhm-Bawerks Marx-Kritik. Translated by Eden and Cedar Paul. Glasgow: Socialist Labour Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837200000985

Hoover, K.D. (1981). Does macroeconomics need microfoundations? In: D.M. Hausman (ed.) [1994]. The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (pp. 315-333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.022

Kalecki, M. (1935). A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles. Econometrica, 3(3), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905325

Keynes, J. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2024. 161001

Keynes, J. (1972). Essays in Persuasion. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Vol. IX, London: Royal Economic Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139524162

King, J. (2008). The Microfoundations Delusion: Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. London: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009123

Klein, L. (1946). Macroeconomics and the Theory of Rational Behavior, Econometrica, 14(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905362

Kriesler, P. (1996). Microfoundations: A Kaleckian Perspective. In: J.E. King (ed), An Alternative Macroeconomic Theory: The Kaleckian Model and Post-Keynesian Economics (pp. 55-72). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1810-8_4

Lallement, J. (2017). Individu et société selon Walras. Revue de Philosophie Économique, 18(1), 57-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.181.0057

Lasry, J.M., and Lions, P.L. (2007). Mean Field Games. Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 2(1), 229-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11537-007-0657-8

Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1(1), 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(76)90049-1

Mantel, R.R. (1974). On the Characterization of Aggregate Excess Demand. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(3), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(74)90100-8.

Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, London: MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375261

Milgate, M., and Eatwell, J. (2021). Macroeconomics before Microeconomics: A Sceptic’s Guide to Macroeconomics. In: E. Bellino and S. Nerozzi (eds.), Pasinetti and the Classical Keynesians: Nine Methodological Issues (pp. 157-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108604236

Richter, M., and Wong, K.C. (1999). Non-computability of Competitive. Economic Theory, Springer; Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory, SAET, 141, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050280

Rizvi, A.T. (1994). The Microfoundations Project in General Equilibrium Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(4), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035280

Robinson, J. (1971). The Measure of Capital: The End of the Controversy. Economic Journal, 81(323), 597-602. https://doi.org/10.2307/2229853

Roemer, J.E. (1982). A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Harvard: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674435865

Shafer, W., and Sonnenschein, H. (1982). Market Demand and Excess Demand Functions. In: K. Arrow and M. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics: Volume II (pp. 671-693). Amsterdam: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4382(82)02009-8

Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199390632.001.0001

Shiozawa, Y., Morioka, M., and Taniguchi, K. (2019). Microfoundations of Evolutionary Economics. Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55267-3

Solow, R. (1986). On the Integrational Allocation of Natural Resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440280

Sonnenschein, H. (1972). Market Excess Demand Functions. Econometrica, 40(3), 549-563. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913184

Sraffa, P. (1926). The Laws of Returns Under Competitive Conditions. Economic Journal, 36(144), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959866

Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Tsoulfidis, L. (2021a). Capital Theory: A Political Economy Approach. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351239424

Tsoulfidis, L. (2021b). Ricardo’s Theory of Value is Alive and Well in Contemporary Capitalism. World Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 493-518. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.12.4.0493

Tsoulfidis, L. (2024a). Competing Schools of Economic Thought: Prospect and Retrospect. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58580-7

Tsoulfidis, L. (2024b). Adam Smith’s Theory of Value and the Falling Rate of Profit: Uncommon Conceptions and Common Misconceptions. Investigación Económica, 83(330), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2024.330.89801

Tsoulfidis, L., and Tsaliki, P. (2019). Classical Political Economics: Theories of Value, Competition, Trade and Long Cycles. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17967-0

Veblen, T. (1900). The Preconceptions of Economic Science. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 14(2), 240-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883645

Velupillai, V. (2005). The Impossibility of an Effective Theory of Policy in a Complex Economy [Working Papers no. 0514]. Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italy.

Walras, L. (1874). Elements of Pure Economics. Homewood, IL, Irwin.

Weintraub, E.R. (1977). The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics: A Critical Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2722711