Resistance to the Strong Program in the Sociology of Knowledge: Scientific Asepsis and the Threat of Relativism

Main Article Content

Clara Márquez Scotti
Ignacio Vilaró Luna

Abstract

In this article we defend the plausibility of adopting a Strong Program in the Sociology of Knowledge. We critically analyze various objections against it; in particular, we show that the auto-refutation charge is not decisive. We offer a Mertonian hypothesis to explain the reason why the Strong Program continues to be the target of very passionate attacks and mockery, despite its prima facie attractiveness and its affinity with contemporary epistemology. Such hypothesis suggests that at least some of the passionate arguments against the Strong Program are motivated by outrage occurring as a result of the violation of a central value of scientific endeavor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Márquez Scotti, C., & Vilaró Luna, I. (2015). Resistance to the Strong Program in the Sociology of Knowledge: Scientific Asepsis and the Threat of Relativism. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales, 59(221). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(14)70816-5

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

Blanco, Rubén, (2001) "Guerras de la ciencia, imposturas intelectuales y estudios de la ciencia" en Reis. Núm. 94, abril-junio, pp. 129-152.

Bloor, David, (1998) Conocimiento e imaginario social, Hombre y Sociedad. Barcelona, Gedisa.

Bloor, David, (1999a) "Anti-Latour" en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 30, núm. 1, pp. 81-112.

Bloor, David, (1999b) "Reply to Bruno Latour" en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 30, núm. 1, pp. 131-6.

Bloor, David, (2011) "Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge" en Steven Hales (ed.), A companion to Relativism. Chichester, West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 433-455.

Bourdieu, Pierre, (1997) Razones prácticas: sobre la teoría de la acción. Barcelona, Anagrama.

Fujimura, Joan, (1998) "Authorizing Knowledge in Science and Anthropology" en American Anthropologist. Vol. 100, núm. 2, junio, pp. 347-360.

Hanson, Norwood Russell, (1958) Patterns of Discovery, an Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge, University Press.

Hempel, Carl Gustav, (2005) La explicación científica: estudios sobre la filosofía de la ciencia. Barcelona, Paidós.

Iranzo, Juan Manuel y José Rubén Blanco, (1999) Sociología del conocimiento científico. Madrid, CIS, Universidad Pública de Navarra.

Kincaid, Harold; Dupré, John, y Alison Wylie, (2007) Value-free Science? Ideals and Illusions. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Kuhn, Thomas, (1971) La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lakatos, Imre, (1970) "History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions" en PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 1970, pp. 91-136.

Latour, Bruno, (1999) "For David Bloor...and Beyond: a Reply to David Bloor's Anti-Latour" en Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 30, núm. 1, pp. 113-29.

Longino, Helen, (1990) Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Merton, Robert, (1985a) La sociología de la ciencia 2. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

Merton, Robert, (1985b) La sociología de la ciencia 1. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

Merton, Robert, (2002[1949]) Teoría y Estructuras Sociales. México, FCE.

Quine, W. V, (1951) "Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism" en The Philosophical Review. Vol. 60, núm. 1, enero, pp. 20-43.

Ross, Andrew, (1996) Science Wars. Durham, Duke University Press.

Sokal, Alan y Jean Bricmont, (1999) Imposturas Intelectuales. Barcelona: Paidós.

Wallerstein, Immanuel, (2005) Las incertidumbres del saber. Barcelona, Gedisa.

Zammito, John, (2004) A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.