The Habitability, the Architectonic, and the Habitable in the Understanding of the Production of the Biopsychosocial-anthropological of the Living and Habitant Human Being

Abstract

In this essay it’s been proposed to expose, explain and, in this way, to encourage critical consideration about the term: “architectural ism”. It is meant as a transcendental dimension that in the eld of architectural pro- duction, it is already the result of a consolidation or connection of the per- manence and natural production in the self of the humane; of the human being that ‘inhabits’, that is sociable, and is alive in the “architectural ism”. Adding the production of its physical transformation built as habitable.

It is also the formal and adequate space so that the human being, in this process, understands and exists in this union, and it has as well obtained and produced the dimension of the human quality of the “archi- tectural ism”. The option of its vital use and consumption is at the same time the generator of the nite and vital permanence.

Taking in consideration that the vitality must be well anchored to the advances of science related to the humane and most importantly to the transdiscipline of the biopsychosocio-cultural of this process in which it must produce and obtain the living experience of Nature and the Humane: the beauty and steadfastness of the so called the “architectural ism”.