Efficiency of Two Interventions in Making Individual Awareness and Women Participation in the
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: to determine the efficiency of two interventions to make women awareness in the participation of the appropriate detection program of cancer of the cervix (DCC). Material and methods: an experimental study realiced in a Primary Care Unit where the women included, according to the NOM-014-SSA2-1994 recommendations, need to be tested. The experimental group was randomized selected (patients were selected to the experimental) or control group (through a randomized method). The dependant variable was the presence of women who wanted the detection test in relation to a period of time. Results: there were 50 women in each group. There was a similar distribution of women that had never taken the detection test before in both groups. In the experimental group there was a higher number of women that took the test after the intervention than in the control group, 34 (68%)
vs. 24 (52%) p<0.05. These values show that there is an important difference in the population who takes the test after the training sessions. Conclusion: there was a bigger positive impact in women who were aware about the cancer of the cervix and the importance of its detection. This reflected in a higher
attendance to the study, mainly in women that had taken the same test previously.
vs. 24 (52%) p<0.05. These values show that there is an important difference in the population who takes the test after the training sessions. Conclusion: there was a bigger positive impact in women who were aware about the cancer of the cervix and the importance of its detection. This reflected in a higher
attendance to the study, mainly in women that had taken the same test previously.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Chiñas Rojas, H., Galan Cobos, A., Pineda, J. M., & Rodríguez Guzmán, L. M. (2010). Efficiency of Two Interventions in Making Individual Awareness and Women Participation in the. Atención Familiar, 16(3), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.22201/facmed.14058871p.2009.3.15393