Tratados bilaterales de inversión y reestructuración de deudas soberanas
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
De manera creciente los tenedores de deuda soberana recurren a los tratados bilaterales de inversiones (TBIs) para controvertir los acuerdos de reestructuración de deudas soberanas en procesos arbitrales. Este artículo estudia críticamente las implicaciones de este fenómeno desde la perspectiva colectiva de los procesos de reestructuración. Para ello se analiza cómo los TBIs y los estándares referentes a las inversiones extranjeras se están utilizando o podrían utilizarse para resolver las controversias relativas a la deuda soberana, así como los problemas económicos y de derechos humanos que suscita la opción del arbitraje que se derivan del uso de los TBIs para controvertir reestructuraciones de deuda soberana.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas en Dimensions Service
Citas
BOHOSLAVSKY, Juan Pablo y GOLDMANN, Matthias, “An Incremental Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Sovereign Debt Sustainability as a Principle of Public International Law”, Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 41, núm. 2, 2016, y UN Doc. A/70/275.
BOHOSLAVSKY, Juan Pablo y JUSTO, Juan, “The conventionality control of investment arbitrations: enhancing coherence through dialogue”, Transnational Dispute Management, vol. 10, núm. 1, 2013.
BRADLOW, Daniel, “Can parallel lines ever meet? The strange case of the international standards on sovereign debt and business and human rights,” Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 41, núm. 2, 2016.
BROWER, Charles y GOETZ-CHARLIER, Alexandra, “International investment arbitration and the global financial system: are they ‘yin’ and ‘yang’ or like oil and water?”, en TAMS, Christian et al (eds.), International Investment Law and the Global Financial Architecture, Elgar Ed., 2017 (cap. 2).
CHAN, Kai-wei, “The Relationship between the International Investment Arbitration and Sovereign Debt Restructuring”, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 2014, vol. 7:1, pp. 229-250.
CHOI, Stephen J. y GULATI, Mitu, “An empirical study of securities disclosure practice,” Tulane Law Review, vol. 80, 2006.
GALLAGHER, Kevin, “International Investment Agreements and Sovereign Debt Restructuring – Mission Creep” en Kavaljit Singh y Burghard Ilge (eds.), Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties. Critical Issues and Policy Choices, 2016, Both Ends, Amsterdam, pp. 201-9.
GELPERN, Anna y SETSER, Brad, “Domestic and external debt: the doomed quest for equal treatment”, Georgetown Journal of International Law, vol. 35, núm. 4, 2004; y UNCTAD, IIA Issues Note No. 2 “Sovereign debt restructuring and international investment agreements”, julio de 2011.
GOURGOURINIS, Anastasios, “Financial crisis as a force majeure under international law and EU law: defending emergency measures, à la européenne, in investment arbitration under intra-EU BITs”, en TAMS, Christian et al (eds.), International Investment Law and the Global Financial Architecture, Elgar Ed., 2017 (cap. 12).
HIRSCH, Moshe, “Investment tribunals and human rights: Divergent paths” en DUPUY, Pierre-Marie et al. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2009 (cap.5).
JUNG, Youngjin y HAN, Sangwook Daniel, “Sovereign debt restructuring under the investor-state dispute regime”, Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 31, núm. 1, 2014. Sobre esta cuestión, véase también ISHIKAWA, Tomoko, “Collective action clauses in sovereign bond contracts and investment treaty arbitration – an approach to reconcile the irreconcilable”, Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, vol. 4, núm. 2, julio de 2014.
NAKAJIMA, Kei, “An elusive safeguard with loopholes: sovereign debt and its ‘negotiated restructuring’ in international investment agreements in the age of global financial crisis,” International Review of Law, vol. 2016, núm. 3, 2016.
NORTON, Ellie, “International investment arbitration and the European debt crisis”, Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 13, núm. 1, 2012. Advirtiendo sobre este riesgo, v. Yuefen Li, “How international investment agreements have made debt restructuring even more difficult and costly”, South Centre Investment Policy Brief No. 10, febrero de 2018, disponible en: <https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IPB10_How-international-investment-agreements-have-made-debt-restructuring-even-more-difficult-and-costly_EN.pdf>.
OSTŘANSKÝ, Josef, “Sovereign Default Disputes in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Jurisdictional Considerations and Policy Implications”, Groningen Journal of International Law, 2015, vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 27-58.
PAHIS, Stratos, “BITs & Bonds: The International Law and Economics of Sovereign Debt”, American Journal of International Law, 2021, vol. 115, n. 2, pp. 242-280.
Rick Rowden, “The case for policy space”, The Mint, Issue 2, junio de 2017.
SCHEFER, K Nadakavukaren (ed), Poverty and the International Economic Legal System: Duties to the World's Poor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013; SCALI, Emma, Sovereign Debt and Socio-Economic Rights Beyond Crisis. The Neoliberalisation of International Law, Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Suescun de ROA, Felipe, “Investor-state arbitration in sovereign debt restructuring: the role of holdouts”, Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 30, núm. 2, 2013.
WAIBEL, Michael, “Opening Pandora’s Box: Sovereign Bonds in International Arbitration”, American Journal of International Law, 2007, vol. 101: 4, pp. 711-759.
WAIBEL, Michael, Sovereign Defaults before International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
WIRTZ, Alison, “Bilateral investment treaties, holdout investors, and their impact on Grenada’s sovereign debt crisis”, Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 16, núm. 1, 2015.
ZIFF, Robert M., “The sovereign debtor’s prison: analysis of the Argentine crisis arbitrations and the implications for investment treaty law”, Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, vol. 10, núm. 3, 2011.
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rfdm.