Origen y desarrollo de los estudios legislativos: temas, escuelas y tendencias
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Los estudios legislativos conforman una subdisciplina de las ciencias sociales que, mediante diferentes estrategias metodológicas y enfoques, busca describir y explicar el comportamiento parlamentario. En este artículo se describe un panorama general de los orígenes, desarrollo y debates contemporáneos sobre el estudio de la representación política y el desempeño de las legislaturas, así como de los espacios de colaboración académica que han permitido la consolidación de la investigación legislativa especializada. Se advierten algunos de los principales retos para este campo de conocimiento frente a los propios desafíos de las ciencias sociales entre los que destacan las limitaciones teóricas y metodológicas, la estrechez de visiones disciplinarias, su escasa relevancia para la reforma institucional y utilidad para la toma de decisiones, las necesarias comparaciones entre casos y su visibilidad.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Citas en Dimensions Service
Références
Abélès, Marc (2000) Un ethnologue a l’Assembleé. Odile Jacob.
Agor, Weston H. (1971) Latin American Legislatures: Their Role and Influence, Analyses for Nine Countries. Praeger Publishers
Ahmad Goraya, Khan (2012) “Developing a Parliamentary Institute: Case Study of the Pakistan Institute for Parliamentary Services” Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3): 658-671.
Alcántara Sáez, M. (1995) “El estudio de las élites parlamentarias en America Latina. Inguruak: Soziologia eta zientzia politikoaren euskal aldizkaria” Revista Vasca de Sociología y Ciencia Política, 13: 25-38.
Arañó, Axel (coord.) (2010) Arquitectura parlamentaria en México: dos siglos de recintos para el diálogo. Conaculta.
Arnold, Douglas (2004) “Foreword” en Mayhew, David (ed.) Congress: the electoral connection. 2da ed. Yale University Press.
Arter, David (2006) “Conclusion. Questioning the ‘Mezey Question’: An Interrogatory Framework for the Comparative Study of Legislatures” Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3-4): 462-482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600877544
Bagehot, Walter (1867) The English Constitution. Londres: Chapman & Hall.
Bárcena Juárez, Sergio y Yann P. Kerevel (2021) “Communicative Responsiveness in the Mexican Senate: A Field Experiment” Democratization, 28(8): 1387-1405.
Bhattacharya, Caroline; Hart, Gavin; Haughey, Sean; Holden Bates, Stephen y Alexandra Meakin (2022) “The State of the Sub-discipline: Mapping Parliamentary and Legislative Studies Using a Survey and Bibliometric Analysis of Three of Its Journals” Parliamentary Affairs, 75(4): 699-726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsac011
Bailey, Stephen K. (1950) Congress Makes a Law. Columbia University Press.
Barker, Anthony y Michael Rush (1970) The Member of Parliament and his Information. University of Toronto Press.
Barnes, Tiffany D. (2016) Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. Cambridge University Press.
Barrientos, Fernando (2017) Historia y balance de la ciencia política en México. Tirant Lo Blanch.
Baumgartner, Frank; Berry, Jeffrey; Hojnacki, Marie; Kimball, David y Beth L. Leech (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. University of Chicago Press.
Beer, Caroline (2003) Electoral Competition and Institutional Change in Mexico. University of Notre Dame Press.
Béjar, Luisa (coord.) (2009) Qué hacen los legisladores en México. El trabajo en comisiones. Porrúa/unam.
Bennett, Oliver (ed.) (2017) Parliamentary Research Handbook. The House of Commons Library/Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
Benoît, Cyril y Olivier Rozenberg (eds.) (2020) Handbook of Parliamentary Studies. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Legislatures. Edward Elgar publishers.
Binder, Sarah A. (2015) “Challenges Ahead for Legislative Studies” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(1): 5-11 [en línea]. Disponible en: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/43862513>
Blondel, Jean (1973) Comparative Legislatures. Prentice-Hall.
Bobbio, Norberto (1987) La teoría de las formas de gobierno en la historia del pensamiento político. 1ra ed. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Bowler, Shaun; Farrell, David y Richard S. Katz (1999) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Ohio University Press.
Bryce, James (1921) Modern Democracies. Macmillan.
Butt, Ronald (1967) Power of Parliament. Constable & Co.
Cain, Bruce; Ferejohn, John y Morris Fiorina (1987) Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Harvard University Press.
Cameron, Charles. M. (2010) Veto Bargaining. Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Holbert N. (1958) The House of Representatives and Foreign Affairs. Pittsburgh University Press.
Caygill, Tom (2019) A critical analysis of post-legislative scrutiny in the UK Parliament [en línea]. University of Newcastle, tesis de doctorado. Disponible en: <https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4626>
Celis, Karen y Sarah Childs (2020) Feminist Democratic Representation. Oxford University Press.
Childs, Sarah, y Joni Lovenduski (2013) “Representation” en Waylen, Georgina; Celis, Karen; Kantola, Johanna y Laurel S. Weldon (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press, pp. 489-513.
Christiansen, Thomas; Griglio, Elena y Nicola Lupo (eds.) (2023) The Routledge Handbook of Parliamentary Administrations. Routledge.
Coleman, S.; Taylor, J.A. y W. Van de Donk (1999) “Parliament in the Age of the Internet” Parliamentary Affairs, 52(3): 365-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/52.3.365
Cowley, Philip (2002) Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting Under Blair. Politico’s.
Cox, Gary W. (1997) Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. (1999) “The Empirical Content of Rational Choice Theory: A Reply to Green and Shapiro” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(2): 147-169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692899011002001
Cox, Gary W. (2008) “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures” en The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford University Press.
Cox, Gary W. y Mathew McCubbins (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. University of California Press.
Cox, Gary W. y Mathew D. McCubbins (2005) Setting the Agenda. Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.
Crewe, Emma (2005) Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester University Press.
Crewe, Emma (2015) The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work. Routledge.
Crewe, Emma (2021) The Anthropology of Parliaments: Entanglements in Democratic Politics. Taylor & Francis.
Crewe, Emma y Marion Müller (2021) Rituals in Parliaments. Peter Lang Verlag.
Crowther, William e Irmina Matonyte (2007) “Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer: Estonia, Lithuania and Moldova compared” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(3): 281-299 [en línea]. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/48609608>
Cuninghame, Keith (2009) Guidelines for Legislative Libraries. 2da ed. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
Dahl, Robert (1950) Congress and Foreign Policy. Harcourt Brace.
Dahl, Robert (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. Yale University Press.
Dexter, Lewis A. (1957) “The representative and his district” Human Organization, 16: 2-13.
De Barbieri, Teresita (2003) Género en el trabajo parlamentario. La legislatura mexicana a fines del siglo xx. clacso.
De Vrieze, Franklin y Philip Norton (eds.) (2021) Parliaments and Post-Legislative Scrutiny. Routledge.
Deutsch, Karl W. (1967) “On the Concepts of Politics and Power” Journal of International Affairs, 21(2), 232–241. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24370062
Fenno Jr., Richard F. (1962) “The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration” The American Political Science Review, 56(2): 310-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952367
Fenno Jr., Richard F. (1966) The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Little, Brown and Company.
Fenno Jr., Richard F. (1973) Congressmen in Committees. Little, Brown and Company.
Fenno Jr., Richard F. (1978) Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Little, Brown and Company.
Flinders, Matthew; Cotter, Leanne; Kelso, Alix y Alex Meakin (2018) “The Politics of Parliamentary Restoration and Renewal: Decisions, Discretion, Democracy” Parliamentary Affairs, 71(1): 144-168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx012
Fiorina, Morris (1977) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. Yale University Press.
Freidenberg, Flavia; Gilas, Karolina; Garrido, Sebastián y Camilo Saavedra (2022) Women in Mexican Subnational Legislatures. From Descriptive to Substantive Representation. Springer.
Fygueroa, Simón (2006) “La investigación académica y su rol” Ciencia e Ingeniería, 27(3): 215-216.
García Montero, Mercedes (2010) “Presidentes y Parlamentos: ¿quién Controla La Actividad Legislativa En América Latina?” Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (131): 140-144.
García Montero, Mercedes (2013) “El procedimiento legislativo en América Latina” América Latina, Hoy, 38: 17-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.10318
Gaines, Brian; Goodwin, Mark; Holden Bates, Stephen y Gisela Sin (2019) “The Study of Legislative Committees” Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3): 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662614.
Gamm, Gerald y John Huber (2002) “Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress” en Katznelson, Ira y Helen Milner (eds.) Political Science: State of the Discipline. W. W. Norton y American Political Science Association, pp. 313-341.
Gause, LaGina (2022) The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Political Representation for Marginalized Groups. Cambridge University Press.
Geddes, Marc (2020) Dramas at Westminster: Select Committees and the Quest for Accountability. Manchester University Press.
Geddes, Marc y R. A. W. Rhodes (2018) “Towards an Interpretive Parliamentary Studies” en Brichzin, Jenni; Krichewsky, Damien; Ringel, Leopold y Jan Schank (eds.) Soziologie der Parlamente: Neue Wege der politischen Institutionenforschung. 1ra ed. Springer, pp. 87-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19945-6
Gilas, Karolina (coord.) (2023) Representación simbólica de las mujeres en América Latina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Goodin, Robert (2011) “The state of the discipline, the discipline of the state” en The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, pp. 3-57.
Green, Donald e Ian Shapiro (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. Yale University Press.
Griffith, Jeffrey y Cristina Leston-Bandeira (2012) “How Are Parliaments Using New Media to Engage with Citizens?” Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(3-4): 496-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706058
Grimmer, Justin (2013) Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, Mogens H. (1987) The Athenian Assembly. Blackwell Classical Studies.
Hibbing, John R. (1991) “Contours of the Modern Congressional Career” The American Political Science Review, 85(2): 405-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963167
Hollis, Christopher (1949) Can Parliament Survive? Hollis & Carter.
Hopkins, Raymond F. (1970) “The Role of the M.P. in Tanzania” The American Political Science Review, 64(3): 754-771.
Huitt, Ralph y Robert L. Peabody (1969) Congress: Two Decades of Analysis. Harper & Row.
Ishiyama, John (2022) “Has legislative power declined globally?” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 30(3): 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2022.2103288
Jacobson, Gary (2004) The politics of Congressional elections. 6th ed. New York: Pearson.
Jackson, Robert J. (1968) Rebels and Whips: Dissension, Discipline and Cohesion in British Political Parties since 1945. Martin’s Press Inc.
Jensen, Magnus y Jonathon Moses (2021) “The state of political science, 2020” European Political Science, 20: 14-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00297-4
Kerevel, Yann P. y Sergio A. Bárcena Juárez (2022) “Informal Coalitions and Legislative Agenda-Setting in Mexico’s Multiparty Presidential System” Latin American Politics & Society, 64(1): 1-22.
Khmelko, Irina; Stapenhurst, Frederick y Michael Mezey (2020) Legislative decline in the 21st century: A comparative perspective. Routledge.
King, Gary; Verba, Sidney y Robert Keohane (1994) Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
Krehbiel, Keith (1992) Information and legislative organization. University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, Keith (1998) Pivotal Politics. A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.
Krook, Mona Lena (2009) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford University Press.
Lees-Smith, Hastings B. (1923) Second Chambers in Theory and Practice. Allen & Unwin.
Lees, John D. y Malcolm Shaw (1979) Committees in Legislatures. A Comparative Analysis. Duke University Press.
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina (2007) “The Impact of the Internet on Parliaments: A Legislative Studies Framework.” Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4), pp. 655–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm040.
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina y Sven T. Siefken (2023) “The Development of Public Engagement as a Core Institutional Role for Parliaments” Journal of Legislative Studies, 29(3): 361-379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2214390
Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press
Linz, Juan J. (1990) “The Perils of Presidentialism” Journal of Democracy, 1: 51-69.
Llanos, Mariana y Detlef Nolte (2003) “Bicameralism in the Americas: around the extremes of symmetry and incongruence” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(3): 54-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000246864
Loewenberg, Gerhard (2011) On Legislatures: The Puzzle of Representation. Paradigm Publishers.
Loewenberg, Gerhard; Patterson Samuel y Malcolm Jewell (eds.) (1985) Handbook of Legislative Research. Harvard University Press.
Loewenberg, Gerhard; Squire, Peverill y Roderick Kiewiet (eds.) (2002) Legislatures: Comparative Perspectives on Representative Assemblies. Michigan University Press.
López Rodríguez, Jonatha Jesús (2023) Más allá del Congreso: causas de la variación en el trabajo territorial de las y los integrantes de la Cámara de Diputados en México. El caso de la lxiv Legislatura (2018-2021). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, tesis de doctorado.
Lowell, Abbott L. (1896) Governments and parties in continental Europe. Longmans, Green & Co.
Mansbridge, Jane (1999) “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes” Journal of Politics, 61(3): 628-657.
Mansbridge, Jane (2003) “Rethinking Representation” The American Political Science Review, 97(4): 515-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856.
March, James G. y Johan P. Olsen (1984) “New institutionalism: organizational factors in political life” American Political Science Review, 78(3): 734-749.
March, James G. y Johan P. Olsen (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press.
Marriott, John A. R. (1910) Second Chambers: An Inductive Study in Political Science Clarendon Press.
Martin Shane (2008) “Two Houses: Legislative Studies and the Atlantic Divide” Political Science & Politics, 41(3): 557-565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909650808075X.
Martin, Shane; Saalfeld, Thomas y Kaare W. Strøm(eds) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press.
Martin, Shane; Saalfeld, Thomas y Kaare W. Strøm (2014) “Introduction” en The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0001
Mattson, Ingvar y Kaare Strom (1995) “Parliamentary Committees” en Döring, Herbert (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. St. Martin’s Press.
Mayhew, David (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.
Meakin, Alexandra (2019) Understanding the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster. Universidad de Sheffield, tesis de doctorado.
Meakin, Alexandra y Sabina Siebert (2024) “Custodians of the Palace of Westminster” Parliamentary Affairs, 77(2): 240-261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad001
Méndez de Hoyos, Irma (2012) “Coaliciones preelectorales y competencia partidista en México a nivel federal y local (1994-2011)” Política y Gobierno, 19(2): 147-198.
Mezey, Michael (1979) Comparative Legislatures. Duke University Press.
Mezey, Michael (1993) “Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance” en Finifter, A.W. (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Washington: American Political Science Association, pp. 335-364.
Michels, Robert (1968) [1911] Political parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Free Press.
Miller, Cherry M. (2021) Gendering the Everyday in the UK House of Commons: Beneath the Spectacle. Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, Cherry M. (2023) “Between Westminster and Brussels: Putting the “Parliament” in Parliamentary Ethnography” Politics & Gender, 19(2): 533-559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000071
Mills, C. Wright (1956) The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
Morales Arroyo, José María (1990) Los Grupos Parlamentarios en las Cortes Generales. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Mosca, Gaetano (1896) Elementi di scienza politica. Torino.
Mueller, Sean; Vatter, Adrian y Sereina Dick (2023) “A New Index of Bicameralism: Taking Legitimacy Seriously” Journal of Legislative Studies, 29(2): 312-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1996753.
Murray, Rainbow (2014) “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All” American Political Science Review, 108(3): 520-32.
North, Douglass C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Norton, Philip (1980) Dissension in the House of Commons, 1974-1979. Clarendon Press.
Norton, Philip (1991) Legislatures. Oxford University Press.
Norton, Philip (2019) “Power behind the Scenes: The Importance of Informal Space in Legislatures” Parliamentary Affairs, 72(2): 245-266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy018
Norton, Philip y David M. Wood (1993) Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliaments and Their Constituents. The University of Kentucky Press.
Olmeda, Juan C. y Lisandro Devoto (2018) “¿Unidos o separados? Dimensionando el éxito de las coaliciones electorales a nivel subnacional en México (2000-2016)” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 64(235). doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.235.61872
Olson, David M. y William E. Crowther (eds.) (2002) Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Ohio University Press.
Olson, David y Michael Mezey (eds.) (1991) Legislatures in the policy process: the dilemmas of economic policy. Cambridge University Press.
Oñate, Pablo y Ortega, Carmen (2019) “Committee Parliamentary Specialization Index. Explaining MPs’ specialisation in the Spanish Congreso de los Diputados” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3): 394-408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662610
Osnabrügge, Moritz; Hobolt, Sara B. y Toni Rodon (2021) “Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments” American Political Science Review, 115(3): 885-899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000356
Ostrogorski, Moisei I. (1902) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Macmillan.
Packenham, Robert (1970) “Legislatures and Political Development” en Kornberg, Allan y Lloyd Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Duke University Press, pp. 521-537.
Pareto, Vilfredo (1963) [1916] The mind and society: a treatise on general sociology. Unabridged and corrected republication. Dover Publications.
Parkinson, John R. (2012) Democracy and Public Space the Physical Sites of Democratic Performance. Oxford University Press.
Patterson, Samuel C. y Anthony Mughan (1999) Senates. Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. The Ohio State University Press.
pela (s.f.) Disponible en: <https://oir.org.es/pela/>
Pelizzo, Ricardo y Frederick Stapenhurst (2012) Parliamentary Oversight Tools: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge.
Pelizzo, Ricardo y Frederick Stapenhurst (2013) Government Accountability and Legislative Oversight. Routledge.
Peters, Guy B. (2021) “Bureaucracy for Democracy: Administration in Support of Legislatures” Journal of Legislative Studies, 27(4): 577-594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1961411
Phillips, Anne (1995) The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race. Oxford University Press.
Phillips, Christian Dyogi (2021) Nowhere to Run: Race, Gender, and Immigration in American Elections. Oxford University Press.
Piscopo, Jennifer M. (2011) “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates” Parliamentary Affairs, 64(3): 448-472.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1967) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. (1968) “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives” The American Political Science Review, 62(1): 144-168.
Polsby, Nelson W. (1975) “Legislatures” en F. Greenstein y N. W. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Polsby, Nelson W. y Eric Schickler (2002) “Landmarks in the Study of Congress since 1945” Annual Review of Political Science, 5: 333-367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.011002.115655.
Poole, Keith (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge University Press.
Powell Neff, Eleanor; Schwindt-Baye, Leslie y Gisela Sin (2023) “Women in Legislative Studies: Improving Gender Equality”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(4): 591-597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000306
Powell, Walter W. y Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Puente, Khemvirg (2017) Cómo se decide el gasto público en méxico. Congreso y proceso presupuestario durante la democratización (1994-2016). unam/La Biblioteca.
Rai, Shirin M. (2011) Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. Routledge.
Reingold, Beth; Haynie, Kerry L. y Kirsten Widner (2020) Race, Gender, and Political Representation: Toward A More Intersectional Approach. Oxford University.
Reynoso, Diego (2011) “Aprendiendo a competir: alianzas electorales y margen de victoria en los Estados Mexicanos, 1988-2006” Política y Gobierno, 18(1): 3-38.
Rommetvedt, Hilmar y Sven T. Siefken (2022) Parliamentary Committees in the Policy Process. Routledge.
Russell, Meg (2000) Reforming the House of Lords: lessons from overseas. Oxford University Press.
Russell, Meg (2013) “Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach.”. Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(3): 370-391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639
Sánchez Martínez, José Said (2017) “La relación Ejecutivo-Legislativo en la aprobación del presupuesto: El caso de México a nivel subnacional” Política y gobierno, 24(2): 371-408 [en línea]. Disponible en: <http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-20372017000200371&lng=es&tlng=es>
Santos, Manoel; Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal y Mercedes García Montero (2014) “El control presidencial de la agenda legislativa en América Latina” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 34(3): 511-536. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2014000300001
Sartori, Giovanni (1996) Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Macmillan.
Sartori, Giovanni (2004) “Where Is Political Science Going?” PS, Political Science & Politics, 37(4): 785-787. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504045147
Saward, Michael (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford University Press.
Saward, Michael (2020) Making Representations: Claim, Counterclaim, and the Politics of Acting for Others. ecpr Press and Rowman and Littlefield International.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Rand McNally.
Schömann, Georg F. (1838) A dissertation on the assemblies of the Athenians In three books. W. P. Grant.
Searing, Donald (1993) Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles. Harvard University Press.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. y Barry R. Weingast (1995) “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions” en Shepsle, Kenneth y Barry Weingast (eds.) Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. University of Michigan Press, pp. 5-36.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. y Mark S. Bonchek (2005) Las fórmulas de la política. Instituciones, racionalidad y comportamiento. Taurus/cide.
Shugart, Matthew y John Carey (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda (1985) “Bring the State back in: Strategies of analysis in current research” en Evans, Peter B.; Rueschemeyer, Dietrich y Theda Skocpol (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-42.
Smith, Steven S. (2012) Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge University Press.
Squire, Peverill (1992) “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17: 69-79.
Squire, Peverill (2007a) “The Institution of ‘Institutionalization” The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1171
Squire, Peverill (2007b) “Measuring Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7: 211-227.
Taylor, Lily R. (1966) Roman voting assemblies: from the Hannibalic war to the dictatorship of Caesar. University of Michigan Press.
Temperley, Harold W. V. (1910) Senates and Upper Chambers: Their Use and Function in the Modern State. Chapman and Hall.
Truman, David B. (1959) The Congressional Party: A Case Study. Wiley.
Tsebelis, George (2002) Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.
Tsebelis, George y Jeannette Money (1997) Bicameralism. Cambridge University Press.
Valencia Escamilla, Laura (2005) La Disciplina Parlamentaria en México. iij, unam.
Vázquez Correa, Lorena (2024) La representación sustantiva de las mujeres en las legislaturas subnacionales en México: de lo descriptivo a lo sustantivo. iij-unam.
Wahlke, John C.; Eulau, Heinz; Buchanan, William (1962) The Legislative System: Explorations in Legislative Behavior. Wiley.
Wehner, Joachim (2006) “Assessing the Power of the Purse: An Index of Legislative Budget Institutions” Political Studies, 54: 767-785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00628.x
Weingast, Barry R., y William J. Marshall (1988) “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets” The Journal of Political Economy, 96(1): 132–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261528.
Westerfield, H. Bradford (1955) Foreign Policy and Party Politics: Pearl Harbor to Korea. Yale University Press.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1964) The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Little Brown.
Willner, Dorothy (1980) “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Anthropologists Advising on Public Policy” American Anthropologist, 82(1): 79-94 [en línea]. Disponible en: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/676129>
Wilson, Woodrow (1885) Congressional Government. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Yankelevich Winocur, Javier (2018) Antropología del Poder Constituyente de la Ciudad de México. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
La Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales publicada por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmcpys/
La RMCPyS autoriza a sus colaboradores que suban una copia de sus trabajos publicados en sus webs personales o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto, siempre y cuando se mencione específicamente a la Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales como fuente original de procedencia, citando el año y número del ejemplar respectivo y añadiendo el enlace a la página web donde este órgano editorial puede ser consultado in toto, de manera abierta y gratuita en: <www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmcpys>.
Las y los lectores tienen libertad para:
Compartir, copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
De acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Atribución: la/el lector/a debe reconocer el crédito de una obra de manera adecuada, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciante o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
- No comercial: la/el lector/a no puede hacer uso del material con fines comerciales.
- Si se mezcla, transforma o se desarrolla a partir de la obra licenciada, no se permite la distribución del material modificado.
Cargos por gestión de artículos
La Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales NO cobra tarifas por recibir, procesar o publicar los artículos (Article Processing Charge [APC]) enviados por los autores.