Populist attitudes and support for democracy among Latin American bureaucrats
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Despite macro-level patterns that link populists in power with democratic backsliding, it is unclear how populist attitudes correlate with attitudes about democracy among individuals. Scholars have only recently turned their attention to this issue and produced inconclusive results. Using our unique survey of Latin American bureaucrats, we investigate how populism operates among bureaucrats, a set of actors with a crucial role in democratic governance. We analyze each of three dimensions of populism separately (anti-elitism, pro-people orientation and Manicheanism). Building on recent scholarship finding that populists are dissatisfied democrats, we examine the relationship between attitudes about each dimension of populism and satisfaction with and support for democracy. We extend current scholarship by deploying two measures of satisfaction with and four measures of support for democracy, including support for checks on the executive. We find that those scoring high on underlying dimensions of populism rate the quality of democracy lower but are not less satisfied with the system in their countries. We also find that those with pro-people attitudes consistently support democracy, including checks on the executive. Those with a Manichean outlook, in contrast, are less supportive of democracy and favor increased executive powers. These complexities suggest the need for more research on the concept of populism, as well as supporting the need for understanding how attitudes among important social groups, particularly institutional actors, may differ from the overall population.
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324-1353.
Anderson, C. J. and Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66-81.
Armingeon, K. and Guthmann, K. (2013). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007-2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 423-442.
Arteaga Botello, N. (2021). The populist transition and the civil sphere in Mexico. In J. C. Alexander, P. Kivisto & G. Sciortino (Eds.), Populism in the Civil Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauer, M. W., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Yesilkagit, K. & Black, S. (2021). Introduction: Populists, democratic backsliding and public administration. In M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit and S. Black (Eds.), Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration. Cambridge University Press.
Borges, A. (2021). The illusion of electoral stability: From party system erosion to right-wing populism in Brazil. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 13(2), 166-191.
Brierley, S., Lowande, K., Potter, R. A. & Toral, G. (2023). Bureaucratic politics: Blind spots and opportunities in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 271-90.
Castanho Silva, B., Andreadis, I., Anduiza, A., Morlet Corti, N. B. Y., Delfino, G. & Rico, G. (2018). Public opinion surveys: A new scale. In K. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The Ideational Approach to Populism: Theory, Method and Analysis (pp. 150-178). Routledge.
Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M. & Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409-424.
Castanho Silva, B., Fuks, M. & Ryo Tamaki, E. (2022). So thin it’s almost invisible: Populist attitudes and voting behavior in Brazil. Electoral Studies, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102434
Claassen, C. (2020). In the mood for democracy? Democratic support as thermostatic opinion. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 36-53.
Claassen, C., Ackermann, K., Bertsou, E., Borba, L., Carlin, R. E., Cavari, A., Dahlum, S., Gherghina, S., Hawkins, D., Lelkes, Y., Magalhaes, P. C., Mattes, R., Meijers, M., Neundorf, A., Ocross, D., Ozturk, A., Sarsfield, R., Self, D., Stanley, B., Tsai, T., Zaslove, A. & Zechmeister, E. (2023). Conceptualizing and measuring support for democracy: A new approach. Working paper. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4622645, accessed 20 Nov. 2023.
Curini, L., Jou, W. & Vincenzo Memoli. (2011). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 241-261.
De la Torre, C. (2017). Populism in Latin America. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo and P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
Elchardus, M. and Spruyt, B. (2016). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), pp.111-133.
Ellenbroek, V., Meijers, M. J. & Krouwel, A. (2023). Populist but pluralist? Populist attitudes and preferences for political pluralism in parliament and government. Parliamentary Affairs, 76(1), 125-145.
Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ political offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152-1178.
Gidengil, E., Stolle, D. & Bergeron-Boutin, O. (2022). The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 61, 901-929.
Grigera, J. (2017). Populism in Latin America: Old and new populisms in Argentina and Brazil. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 441-455.
Gueddes-Neto, J. V. & Peters, B. G. (2021). Working, shirking and sabotage in times of democratic backsliding: An experimental study in Brazil. In M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit and S. Black (Eds.), Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration. Cambridge University Press.
Haggard, S. & Kaufman, R. (2021). Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Elements in Political Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, K. A., Read, M. and Pauwels, T. (2017). Populism and its causes. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Tagger, P. Ochoa Espejo & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 267-286). Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, K. A. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019). Introduction: The ideational approach. The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Hawkins, K. A., Ruth-Lovell, S. P. and Mitchell, G. (2023). The impact of populism on democratic contestation: Ideas or strategy? [Conference]. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, California, EE.UU.
Houle, C. and Kenny, P. (2018). The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America. Government and Opposition, 53(2), 256–87.
Huber, R. A. and Schimpf, C. H. (2016). Friend or Foe? Testing the Influence of Populism on Democratic Quality in Latin America. Political Studies, 64(4), 872–89.
Kenny, P. D. (2020). ‘The Enemy of the People’: Populists and Press Freedom. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 261–75.
König, P. D., Siewert, M. B. and Ackermann, K. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring citizens preferences for democracy: Taking stock of three decades of research in a fragmented field. Comparative Political Studies, 55(12), 2015-2049.
Kertzer, J. D. and Renshon, J. (2022). Experiments and surveys on political elites. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 529-550.
López, M. (2023). The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys. Quality and Quantity, 57, 1303-1319.
Lupu, N., Rodríguez, M. and Zechmeister, E. (Eds). (2021). Pulse of Democracy. LAPOP.
McKay, B. M., & Colque, G. (2021). Populism and Its Authoritarian Tendencies: The Politics of Division in Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211052980
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667-1693.
Muno, W. and Briceño, B. (2021). Venezuela: Sidelining public administration under a revolutionary-populist regime. In M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit & S. Black (Eds.), Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration (pp. 200-220). Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2020). Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics, 26(6), 697-717.
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P. and Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. and Van Hauwaert, S. M. (2020). The populist citizen: Empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America. European Political Science Review, 12, 1-18.
Ruth-Lovell, S. P. and Grahn, S. (2022). Threat or Corrective to Democracy? The Relationship between Populism and Different Models of Democracy. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12564.
Schulz, A., Muller, P., Schemer, C., Dominique, S. W., Wettstein, M. & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30, 316-326.
Singer, M. (2018). Delegating away democracy: How good representation and policy successes can undermine democratic legitimacy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1754-1788.
Spruyt, B., Keppens, G. and Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335-346.
Stoker, G. & Hay, C. (2017). Understanding and challenging populist negativity towards politics: The perspectives of British citizens. Political Studies, 65(1), 4-23.
Urbinati, N. (2017). Populism and the Principle of Majority. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo and P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
Van Hauwaert, S. and Van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 68-92.
Vittori, D. (2022). Threat or Corrective? Assessing the Impact of Populist Parties in Government on the Qualities of Democracy: A 19-Country Comparison. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 589–609.
Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C. & Schoen, H. (2020). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356-374.
Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C. & Schoen, H. (2023). Populist citizens in four European countries: Widespread dissatisfaction goes with contradictory but pro-democratic regime preferences. Swiss Political Science Review, 29(2), 246-257.
Zaslove, A., Geurkink, B., Jacobs, K. & Akkerman, A. (2020). Power to the people? Populism, democracy, and political participation: a citizen's perspective. West European Politics, 44(4), 727-751.
Zaslove, A., & Meijers, M. (2023). Populist Democrats? Unpacking the Relationship Between Populist and Democratic Attitudes at the Citizen Level. Political Studies, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231173800.
Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmop.