El Banco de desarrollo KfW y el financiamiento de infraestructura hídrica en América Latina
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo arroja luz sobre la cuestión de hasta qué punto los bancos públicos de desarrollo pueden, y de hecho lo hacen, contribuir a alcanzar el Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) 6 de las Naciones Unidas sobre agua y saneamiento en las actuales condiciones políticas y económicas, basándose en el caso del Banco de Desarrollo KfW alemán y sus actividades en América Latina. Se concluye que los grandes proyectos de infraestructura de servicios de abastecimiento de agua y saneamiento (WSS, por sus siglas en inglés) financiables basados en modelos de recuperación de costos difícilmente pueden proporcionar los sistemas de WSS que se necesitan en América Latina de manera sostenible. Para alcanzar el ODS 6 es necesario otorgar subsidios a largo plazo a los servicios públicos de agua y abordar las condiciones políticas de la gobernanza de los servicios públicos de agua y saneamiento sobre el terreno.
Detalles del artículo
Citas en Dimensions Service
Citas
Adjei Adams, E., Sambu, D., y Smiley, S. L. [2019]. Urban water supply in Sub-Saharan Africa: Historical and emerging policies and institutional arrangements. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(2), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1423282
AFD. [2021]. The role of National Public Development Banks in financing the water and sanitation SDG 6, the water related goals of the Paris agreement and biodiversity protection. Unpublished report.
Ajami, N., Habicht, H., Fewell, B., Lattimer, T., y Ng, T. [2018]. Water finance: The imperative for water security and economic growth. Stanford University.
Alaerts, G. J. [2019]. Financing for water – Water for financing: A global review of policy and practice. Sustainability, 11(3), 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030821
Bakker, K. [2003]. Archipelagos and networks: Urbanization and water privatization in the South. The Geographical Journal, 169(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2003. 00097.x
Bakker, K. [2010]. Privatizing water: Governance failure and the world’s urban water crisis. Cornell University Press.
Bakker, K. [2013]. Constructing ‘public’ water: The World Bank, urban water supply, and the biopolitics of development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, (31)(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1068/d5111
Banco Mundial. [2017]. Reducing inequalities in water supply, sanitation, and hygiene in the era of the sustainable development goals: Synthesis report of the WASH poverty diagnostic initiative. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/27831/w17075.pdf?sequence= 5&isallowed=y
Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung. [2017]. BMZ Wasserstrategie. Schlüssel zur Umsetzung der Agenda 2030 und des Klimaabkommens. https:// www.bmz.de/resource/blob/23546/5548d67aa206b6300f26a7eb08b1c1ba/strategiepapier404- 06-2017-data.pdf
Caldeira, T. P. R. [2017]. Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0263775816658479
Christian, B. [2020]. Dürfen sie nicht oder wollten sie nicht? ‘Kritik von innen’ in staatlichen Entwicklungsorganisationen Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 27(2), 65–93. https:// doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2020-2-65
Cooperación Andina de Fomento. [2018] https://www.caf.com/en/currently/news/2018/03/howefficient-is-the-supply-of-water-in-latin-america/
Coutard, O. [2008]. Placing splintering urbanism: Introduction. Geoforum, 39(6), 1815–1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.10.008
Criqui, L. [2020]. Sociotechnical alternatives and controversies in extending water and sanitation networks in Lima. Peru. Water Alternatives, 13(1), 160–181. https://www.water-alternatives. org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue1/569-a13-1-8/file
Escobar, A. [1995]. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
Ferguson, J. [1994]. The anti-politics machine. ‘development’ and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. The Ecologist, 24(5), 176–181. http://www.brandonkendhammer.com/politics_of_develop ment/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ecologist-1994-09.pdf
Fritz, T. [2006]. Schleichende Privatisierung. Kritik der deutschen und internationalen Entwicklungshilfe im Wassersektor. Berliner Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Umwelt und Entwicklung e.V. und Forschungs- und Dokumentationszentrum Chile-Lateinamerika e.V. Berlin. https://www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/Schleichende-Privatisierung.pdf
Fröbel, F., Heinrichs, J., y Kreye, O. [1980]. The new international division of labour. Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S., y Marvin, S. [2001]. Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
Grindle, M. S., y Thomas, J. W. [1991]. Public choices and policy change. The political economy of reform in developing countries. John Hopkins University Press.
Harriss, J. [2001]. Depoliticizing development. The World Bank and social capital. Anthem Press.
Jaglin, S. 2008. Differentiating networked services in Cape Town: Echoes of splintering urbanism?. Geoforum, 39(6), 1897–1906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.010
KfW. [2021a]. Our international commitment. https://www.kfw.de/kfw.de-2.html
KfW. [2021b]. Projektdatenbank. https://www.kfw-entwicklungsbank.de/InternationaleFinanzierung/KfW-Entwicklungsbank/Projekte/Projektdatenbank/index.jsp?query=*%3A* &page=1&rows=10&sortBy=relevance&sortOrder=desc&facet.filter.language= de&dymFailover=true&groups=1
Kolker, J., Kingdom, B., Trémolet, S., Winpenny, J., y Cardone, R. [2016]. Financing options for the 2030 water agenda. Knowledge Brief. World Bank Group: Washington, DC.
Kooy, M., y Bakker, K. [2008]. Splintered networks: The colonial and contemporary waters of Jakarta. Geoforum, 39(2008), 1843–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.012
Latin American Investment Facility (LAIF). [2021]. About LAIF. https://www.eulaif.eu/en/aboutlaif
Libey, A., Adank, M., y Thomas, E. [2020]. Who pays for water? Comparing life cycle costs of water services among several low, medium and high-income utilities. World Development 136 (online first).
Loftus, A., y McDonald, D. [2001]. Of liquid dreams: A political ecology of water privatization in Buenos Aires. Environment & Urbanization, 13(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 095624780101300215
Machete, I., y Marques, R. [2021]. Financing the water and sanitation sectors: A hybrid literature review. Infrastructures, 6(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6010009
Mader, P. [2011]. Attempting the production of public goods through microfinance: The case of water and sanitation. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 3(2), 153–170.
Marois, T. [2020]. The KfW and Covid-19: Coordinating public finance responses at home and abroad. In D. McDonald, T. Marois, & D. Barrowclough (Eds.), Public banks and Covid-19. Combatting the pandemic with public finance (pp. 149–170). Municipal Services Project (Kingston), UNCTAD (Geneva), Eurodad (Brussels).
Marois, T. [2021]. Public Banks. Decarbonisation, definancialisation, and democratisation. Cambridge University Press.
Marois, T. [2022]. A dynamic theory of public banks (and why it matters). Review of Political Economy, 34(2), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.1898110
McDonald, D. A. [2016]. To corporatize or not to corporatize (and if so, how?). Utilities Policy, 40 (2016), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.01.002
McDonald, D. A., Marois, T., y Spronk, S. [2021]. Public banks + public water = SDG 6? Water Alternatives, 14(1), 117–134. http://publicbankscovid19.org/images/PDF_FILES/Art14-1-1.pdf
McDonald, D. A., Spronk, S., y Chavez, D. (eds.). [2020]. Public water and COVID-19: Dark clouds and silver linings. Kingston: Municipal Services Project; Amsterdam: Transnational Institute; Buenos Aires: Latin American Council of Social Sciences.
Mosse, D. [2004]. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X. 2004.00374.x
Naqvi, N., Henow, A., y Chang, H.-J. [2018]. Kicking away the financial ladder? German development banking under economic globalisation. Review of International Political Economy, 25 (5), 672–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1480515
OCDE. [2010]. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. Innovative finance mechanisms for the water sector.
Reckhard, V. [2006]. Förderung der Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft in der Finanziellen Zusammenarbeit. Folienvortrag für die BWK-Fachtagung Internationale Wasserwirtschaft, 23.2.2006. Frankfurt: KfW Bankengruppe.
Reis, N. [2012]. Tracing and making the state. Policy practices and domestic water supply in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. LIT.
Reis, N. [2020]. The perils of monetary policy in the global periphery during the Covid-19 pandemic. Contribution for Developing Economics Blog, 22(September), 2020. https://developin geconomics.org/2020/09/22/the-perils-of-monetary-policy-in-the-global-periphery-duringthe-covid-19-pandemic/ Reis, N., & Lukas, M. (eds.). (2022). Beyond the Mega-City: New dimensions of peripheral urbanization in Latin America. University of Toronto Press.
Reis, N., y Mollinga, P. P. [2012]. Water supply or ‘beautiful latrines’? Microcredit for rural water supply and sanitation in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 5(1), 10–29.
Soares, D. [2007]. Crónica de un fracaso anunciado: La descentralización en la gestión del agua potable en México. Agricultura, sociedad y desarrollo, 4(1), 19–37.http://www.scielo.org.mx/ pdf/asd/v4n1/v4n1a2.pdf
Sturzenegger, G., Vidal, C., y Martinez, S. 2020. The last mile challenge of sewage services in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/ publications/english/document/The-Last-Mile-Challenge-of-Sewage-Services-in-LatinAmerica-and-the-Caribbean.pdf
Swyngedouw, E. [2005]. Dispossessing H2O: The contested terrain of water privatization. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 16(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045575052000335384
United Nations (UN). [2019]. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2019. Leaving No One Behind. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer.xhtml?v=2.1.196&id=p:: usmarcdef_0000367306&file=/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/ attach_import_ff9f03a3-1641-46ed-a5e0-a44f6b0ac9a9%3F_%3D367306eng.pdf&locale= en&multi=true&ark=/ark:/48223/pf0000367306/PDF/367306eng.pdf#WWDR%202019%20EN %2011MAR.indd%3A.48093%3A1042
WHO y UNICEF. [2021]. WASH Data. Latin America and the Caribbean. https://washdata.org/ data/household#!/
Wilder, M. [2010]. Water governance in Mexico: Political and economic apertures and a shifting state–citizen relationship. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03469- 150222
World Health Organization (WHO). [2019]. 1 in 3 people globally do not have access to safe drinking water. UNICEF, WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-1-in-3-people-globally-do-not-have-access-to-safe-drinking-water-unicef-who
Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.