Experts In Public Life: ¿Independent Elite Groups Or Socialized Inquiry? A Contribution Of Lippmann-Dewey’s Debate In The Contemporary Context
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this writing is to analyze the epistemological background, mainly concerning the conception of science that underlies in the debate concerning public opinion between Walter Lippmann and John Dewey. Then, I will qualify the debate and show the advantages involved in Dewey’s proposal. Finally, I will also point out the disadvantages of such a conception and suggest, as a result, a new point of view for the contemporaneous discussion concerning deliberative democracy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Hernández N. (2017). Experts In Public Life: ¿Independent Elite Groups Or Socialized Inquiry? A Contribution Of Lippmann-Dewey’s Debate In The Contemporary Context. Península, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsla.2017.06.008
Citas en Dimensions Service
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), todos los derechos reservados 2013-2013.