ADAM SMITH’S PLURALISM AND THE SCIENCE OF THE LEGISLATOR

Main Article Content

Richard Sturn

Abstract

It is well established that we can make sense of Adam Smith’s multi-faceted account of human agency without incurring “das Adam Smith-Problem”. However, the relevance of his view of knowledge and agency for political economy as science of the legislator deserves to be studied more carefully. Smith’s view of human agency is linked to political realism and pragmatic pluralism, emphasizing the benefits of the knowledge made available by scientific “systems”, but also their limitations and incompleteness. Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments, seen together with his realist discussions of mercantilist politics are suggesting explanatory and pragmatic advantages of such pluralism, while opening up horizons of problem-responsive second-best reforms avoiding fallacies of “the man of system”.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sturn, R. (2024). ADAM SMITH’S PLURALISM AND THE SCIENCE OF THE LEGISLATOR. Investigación Económica, 83(330), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2024.330.89110

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

Brown, V. (1994). Adam Smith’s Discourse. London: Routledge.

Colander, D., and Freedman, C. (2019). Where Economics Went Wrong. Princeton: PUP.

Collins, G.M. (2022). Adam Smith on the Navigation Acts and Anglo-American Imperial Relations. History of Political Thought, 43, 273-304.

Hont, I. (2005). Jealousy of Trade. Cambridge MA: HUP.

Hume, D. (1739/40). A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon.

Larmore, Ch. (2020). What is Political Philosophy? Princeton: PUP.

Palen, M.-W. (2014). Adam Smith as Advocate of Empire, c. 1870-1932. The Historical Journal, 57(1), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X13000101

Phillipson, N. (2011). An Enlightened Live. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics Rules. New York: Norton.

Sagar, P. (2022). Adam Smith Reconsidered. Princeton: PUP.

Smith, A. (1759, 1790 [1976]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. by D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie (Bd. 1 der “Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith”). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, A. (1776 [1976]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. by R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (Bd. 2 der “Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith”). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, A. (1977). The Correspondence of Adam Smith, ed. by E.C. Mossner and I.S. Ross (Bd. VI der “Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith”). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Smith, A. (1980). Essays on Philosophical Subjects, ed. by D.D. Raphael, and A.S. Skinner (Bd. III der “Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith”). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sturn, R. (2001). Gerechtigkeit in dynamischen Marktgesellschaften: Vorbemerkungen zu einer Theorie ethischer Arbeitsteilung. In: P. Koller (ed.), Gerechtigkeit im politischen Diskurs der Gegenwart (pp. 165-199). Vienna: Passagen.

Sturn, R. (2010). On making full sense of Adam Smith. Homo Oeconomicus, 27(3), 263-287.

Sturn, R. (2024). “The Greatest and Noblest of all Characters”: Improvements, Impartiality, and the Science of the Legislator. Journal of Contextual Economics: Schmollers Jahrbuch. forthcoming.

Sturn, R. (2025). Adam Smith’s Pluralism and the Limits of Science. Homo Oeconomicus, 39, forthcoming.

Weingast, B.R. (2018). War, Trade, and Mercantilism: Reconciling Adam Smith’s Three Theories of the British Empire. Available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2915959 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2915959