2006: a Thematic Quarrel

Main Article Content

Fernando Castaños

Abstract

On the basis of Budge and Farlie´s theory of electoral processes as thematic quarrels, it is possible to account for Mexico´s 2006 presidential election, which started with a large advantage for one candidate and ended with a very close win for another candidate. Attention to various issues and issue types was distributed in a dynamics dependent upon the candidate´s campaigns and behavior. Those themes were ordered in hierarchies that changed over time and they were associated differentially to candidates.

This movement, which explains the notable change in voters´ preferences, does not only entail that themes were resignified during the campaign, but also that their meaning frameworks were redrawn. On the basis of this analysis, it is suggested that the theory ought to be developed  beyond their original formulation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Castaños, F. (2013). 2006: a Thematic Quarrel. Revista Mexicana De Opinión Pública, (2). https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2006.2.41840
Author Biography

Fernando Castaños, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales (IIS), UNAM

Doctor of Education from the Institute of Education, University of London, attached to the Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales UNAM, researcher and member of the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores.
Among his recent publications are "Tu, is dit lui-meme to Hamlet: une réflexion sur les transpositions pronominal", in La voix du tiers cachée: des non-dits du discours, and in press "Deliberation: condition and horizont of democracy" in the El estado actual de la democracia en México: retos, avances y retrocesos. zuno@servidor.unam.mx