July 2, 2006. "Before, during and after"
Main Article Content
Abstract
The author classifies good and bad aspects of the presidential election of July 2, 2006: quality of the voter registry; anticipation of a “closed” election; more or less balanced media follow-up of three leading contenders; biased opinions of the newscasters against CPBT, estimated expense on TV adds; IFE´s incursion on “estimation” exercises instead of outsourcing as in previous elections; use by political parties of legal channels to challenge results; and the non acceptance of the CPBT of the final official presidential election result.
Article Details
How to Cite
Berumen, E. (2013). July 2, 2006. "Before, during and after". Revista Mexicana De Opinión Pública, (2). https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2006.2.41845
Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmop.