`Caimanes del mismo pozo'. Populism and Representations of the Media and the Press in the Hegemonic Stabilization of Chavismo

Main Article Content

Philip Kitzberger

Abstract

Contemporary populisms, on the Left and on the Right, have tended to confront established media institutions. Their political communication reflects this confrontation in the sustained public questioning ―through direct communication devices― of the media and/or journalism as part or expression of an elite opposed to the people.

            The article’s main goals are: first, to systematize the representations on the nature, role and functions of media and journalism contained in public discourses of government actors that opted to antagonize these institutions; second, to seek explanations to their variation; third, to explore the connections between discourse and political strategies regarding media and press institutions.

            Through a content analysis of Hugo Chávez’s public interventions occurred between 1999 and 2004, the article describes the presence and variation in populist framings on media and relates them with some phases of political conflict. It additionally shows how factors such as ideology, the historical patterns of media-State relations in the Venezuelan petrostate and the dynamics of political conflict shaped peculiar features of Chávez’s representations of the media and his practical orientations towards them.

 

 

 

Article Details

How to Cite
Kitzberger, P. (2018). `Caimanes del mismo pozo’. Populism and Representations of the Media and the Press in the Hegemonic Stabilization of Chavismo. Revista Mexicana De Opinión Pública, (25), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2018.25.63322

Citas en Dimensions Service

Author Biography

Philip Kitzberger, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

Philip Kitzberger 

Regular professor of the Departamento de Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales de la Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (Buenos Aires) and assistant researcher of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. He completed a degree in political science and a Phd in philosophy at the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. His research agenda focuses on the intersection between political processes and media. His most recent works focus on the conflictive relationships between governments and media institutions in Latin America.

pkitzberger@utdt.edu.

 

References

AALBERG, Toril, ESSER, Frank, REINEMANN, Carsten, STRÖMBÄCK, Jesper y VREESE, Claes de (eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe, Routledge, Nueva York, 2017.

CANE, James, The Fourth Enemy: Journalism and Power in the Making of Peronist Argentina, 1930-1955, Penn State University Press, Pensilvania, 2012.

CAÑIZÁLEZ, Andrés y LUGO-OCANDO, Jairo, “The Media in Venezuela: The Revolution Was Televised, But No One Was Really Watching”, en Lugo-Ocando (ed.), The Media in Latin America, Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2008.

CERBINO, Mauro, MALUF, Marcia y RAMOS, Isabel, Los Enlaces Ciudadanos del presidente Rafael Correa. Entre la exaltación del pueblo y el combate a los medios, FLACSO, Quito, 2016.

CHÁVEZ, Hugo, Selección de discursos del presidente de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela, tomos 1-6, Ediciones de la Presidencia, Caracas, 1999-2004.

CIMAGLIO, Christopher, “‘A Tiny and Closed Fraternity of Privileged Men’: The Nixon-Agnew Antimedia Campaign and the Liberal Roots of the US Conservative ‘Liberal Media’ Critique”, International Journal of Communication, núm. 10, University of Southern California, Los Ángeles, 2016, pp. 1-19.

DÍAZ RANGEL, Eleazar, “Fragmento de un discurso”, en Marinellys Tremamunno (ed.), Chávez y los medios de comunicación social, Alfadil, Caracas, 2002.

ENTMAN, Robert, “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”, Journal of Communication, vol. 43, núm. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 51-58.

FRAJMAN, Eduardo, “Broadcasting Populist Leadership: Hugo Chávez and Aló Presidente”, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 46, núm. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 501-526.

GOLDSTEIN, Ariel, Prensa tradicional y liderazgos populares en Brasil, Editorial A Contracorriente, Raleigh, 2017.

KITZBERGER, Philip, “The Media Activism of Latin America’s Leftist Governments: Does Ideology Matter?”, German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Working Paper, núm. 151, Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Hamburgo, 2010.

KITZBERGER, Philip, “Media Wars and the New Left: Governability and Media Democratization in Argentina and Brazil”, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 48, núm. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, pp. 447-476.

KITZBERGER, Philip, “¿Populismo o narcisismo? Donald Trump versus el periodismo”, Nueva Sociedad, núm. 270, Fundación Fiedrich Ebert, Buenos Aires, 2017, pp. 14-26.

KITZBERGER, Philip, “Variaciones en la legislación de medios en América Latina y sus determinantes”, en Pablo J. Boczkowski y Eugenia Mitchelstein, Titulares, hashtags y videoguegos. La comunicación en la era digital, Manantial, Buenos Aires, 2017.

KNUDSON, Jerry, “The Press and National Revolution in Bolivia”, Journalism Monographs, núm. 31, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, 1973.

LACLAU, Ernesto, “Populismo: ¿qué nos dice el nombre?”, en Francisco Panizza (comp.), El populismo como espejo de la democracia, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 2009, pp. 51-70.

LACLAU, Ernesto, La razón populista, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 2005.

LODOLA, Germán y KITZBERGER, Philip, “Politización y confianza en los medios de comunicación: Argentina durante el kirchnerismo”, Revista de Ciencia Política, vol. 37, núm. 3, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, 2017, pp. 635-658.

LÓPEZ MAYA, Margarita, Del viernes negro al referendo revocatorio, Alfadil, Caracas, 2005.

LUPIEN, Pascal, “The Media in Venezuela and Bolivia. Attacking the ‘Bad Left’ from Below”, Latin American Perspectives, vol. 40, núm. 3, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California, 2013, pp. 226-246.

MUDDE, Cas y ROVIRA, Cristobal, “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America”, Government and Opposition, vol. 48, núm. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 147-174.

MUDDE, Cas y ROVIRA, Cristobal, Populism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.

OSTIGUY, Pierre y CASULLO, María Esperanza, “Left versus Right Populism: Antagonism and the Social Other”, ponencia presentada en la 67th PSA Annual International Conference, Glasgow, Reino Unido, 10-12 de abril, 2017.

PANIZZA, Francisco, “Introducción”, en Francisco Panizza (comp.), El populismo como espejo de la democracia, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 2009.

PORTO, Mauro, Media Power and Democratization in Brasil. TV Globo and the Dilemmas of Political Accountability, Routledge, Nueva York, 2012.

SCHULIAQUER, Ivan, El poder de los medios. Seis intelectuales en busca de definiciones, Capital Intelectual, Buenos Aires, 2014.

TORO, Francisco y FEINMAN, Sacha (2008), “Invisible Continuities: The Media and Its Freedom in the Venezuelan Petrostate”, Lateinamerika Analysen, núm. 19, German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburgo, pp. 95-118.

VINCENT, Lucía, Los medios y los fines. El gobierno de Néstor Kirchner y su relación con la prensa, tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Buenos Aires, s.f.

WAISBORD, Silvio, Vox populista. Medios, periodismo y democracia, Gedisa, Buenos Aires, 2013.

WAISBORD, Silvio y AMADO, Adriana, “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America”, Information, Communication and Society, vol. 20, núm. 7, Routledge, Oxford, 2017, pp. 1330-1346.

WEYLAND, Kurt, “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, núm. 1, City University of the New York (CUNY), Nueva York, 2001, pp. 1-22.