When Arrows Mislead: Addressing Persistent Misconceptions About Arrows in Organic Mechanisms
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Los mecanismos de reacción química constituyen una herramienta fundamental para interpretar y ejemplificar las reacciones químicas, ofreciendo una visión detallada de las complejidades de las vías de reacción. Aunque esta herramienta permite comprender mejor cómo ocurren las reacciones químicas, la representación de estos mecanismos suele emplear símbolos y notaciones que pueden generar ambigüedades o malentendidos. Este artículo tiene como objetivo abordar la importancia crítica de definir y clarificar los símbolos utilizados en los mecanismos de reacción química, resaltando su papel en mejorar la precisión y promover una comprensión más sólida en la comunicación científica. Al enfrentar estos desafíos, la investigación contribuye al perfeccionamiento del discurso científico, fomentando una mayor claridad y exactitud en la representación de los procesos químicos.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Referencias
Alvarez, S. (2012). Chemistry: A Panoply of Arrows. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(3), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101767
Andrés, J., Berski, S., & Silvi, B. (2016). Curly arrows meet electron density transfers in chemical reaction mechanisms: From electron localization function (ELF) analysis to valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) inspired interpretation. Chemical Communications, 52(53), 8183–8195. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC09816E
Bhattacharyya, G. (2014). Trials and tribulations: Student approaches and difficulties with proposing mechanisms using the electron-pushing formalism. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00127J
Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G. M. (2005). “It Gets Me to the Product”: How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(9), 1402-1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402
Bruice, P. Y. (2008). Química orgánica: Quinta edición. Pearson Educación.
Carey, F. A., & Giuliano, R. M. (2014). Química orgánica. McGraw-Hill Education.
Crandell, O. M., Kouyoumdjian, H., Underwood, S. M., & Cooper, M. M. (2019). Reasoning about Reactions in Organic Chemistry: Starting It in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00784
Crandell, O. M., Lockhart, M. A., & Cooper, M. M. (2020). Arrows on the Page Are Not a Good Gauge: Evidence for the Importance of Causal Mechanistic Explanations about Nucleophilic Substitution in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00815
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning Studies in Science Education 25(1), 69-96.
Gold, V., McNaught, A., & The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) (Eds.). (2025). The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology: The Gold Book (5th ed.). International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook
Glendening, E. D., & Weinhold, F. (2019). Resonance Natural Bond Orbitals: Efficient Semilocalized Orbitals for Computing and Visualizing Reactive Chemical Processes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(2), 916–921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00948
Gold, V., McNaught, A., & The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) (Eds.). (2025). The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology: The Gold Book (5th ed.). International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook
Grossman, R. B. (2019). The Art of Writing Reasonable Organic Reaction Mechanisms. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28733-7
Guthrie, R. D., & Jencks, W. P. (1989). IUPAC recommendations for the representation of reaction mechanisms. Accounts of Chemical Research, 22(10), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00166a001
Izquierdo, J. F., Cunill, F., Tejero, J., Ibora, M., & Fité, C. (2004). Cinética de las Reacciones Químicas. Edicions Universitat Barcelona.
Laidler, K. J. (1996). A glossary of terms used in chemical kinetics, including reaction dynamics (IUPAC Recommendations 1996). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 68(1), 149–192. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199668010149
Laidler, K. J. Symbolism and terminology in chemical kinetics (Appendix no. V to manual of symbols and terminology for physicochemical quantities and units). (1981). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 53(3), 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198153030753
Lakshminarayanan, A. (2010). Arrows in chemistry. Resonance, 15(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-010-0006-8
Lamoureux, G., & Ogilvie, J. F. (2021). ORBITALS IN GENERAL CHEMISTRY, PART I: THE GREAT DEBATE. Química Nova, 44(2), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170649
Lavoisier, A. L. (1789). Traité élémentaire de chimie t. 1 (1789) [Digital Book]. Chez Cuchet. https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/traiteyeyleyment1lavo
Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1-2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.828406
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
Nash, L. K. (2013). Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics: Second Edition. Courier Corporation.
Parkin, G. (2019). Representation of Three-Center–Two-Electron Bonds in Covalent Molecules with Bridging Hydrogen Atoms. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2467–2475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00750
Rogers, F., Huddle, P. A., & White, M. W. (2000). Simulations for Teaching Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 920-926. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p920
Russ, R. S., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D., & Mikeska, J. (2008). Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science Education, 92(3), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20264
Scholz, F., & Kahlert, H. (2019). Chemical Equilibria in Analytical Chemistry: The Theory of Acid–Base, Complex, Precipitation and Redox Equilibria. Springer.
Scudder, P. H. (2023). Electron Flow in Organic Chemistry: A Decision-Based Guide to Organic Mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons.
Straumanis, A. R., & Ruder, S. M. (2009). New Bouncing Curved Arrow Technique for the Depiction of Organic Mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1389-1391. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1389
Sykes, P. (2010). Mecanismos de reacción en química orgánica. Reverte.
Tavakoli, M., Chiu, Y. T. T., Shmakov, A., Carlton, A. M., Van Vranken, D., & Baldi, P. (2023). AI for Interpretable Chemistry: Predicting Radical Mechanistic Pathways via Contrastive Learning (arXiv:2311.01118). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.01118
Wade, L. G., & Simek, J. W. (2017). Química orgánica. Pearson Educación de México.
Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2019). Characterization of First-Semester Organic Chemistry Peer-Led Team Learning and Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning Students’ Use and Explanation of Electron-Pushing Formalism. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00387
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Educación Química por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/req.